Biremis employed an individual as its controller and as controller for several of its affiliated companies who was arrested and charged with numerous criminal violations. The individual informed Beck that criminal charges had been filed against him and, although the individual misrepresented the nature of the charges, Beck failed to follow up or otherwise investigate the criminal allegations against the individual. Beck failed to instruct other firm employees to investigate the charges against the individual. The Firm's written supervisory procedures, which were Beck’s responsibility, did not require any such follow-up.
FINRA found that the individual was convicted, which made him statutorily disqualified from employment in the securities industry; and the firm, acting through Beck, failed to file a written application (Membership Continuance Form-400 (MC-400)) for relief from the statutory disqualification so that the individual could continue to associate with the firm, and the individual continued working as the firm’s Financial and Operations Principal (FINOP).
Acting through Beck, the Firm failed to establish, maintain and enforce a supervisory system and/or written supervisory procedures reasonably designed to investigate prospective employees’ backgrounds, follow up on any red flags and achieve compliance with its registration and Uniform Application for Securities Industry Registration or Transfer (Form U4) reporting obligations.
Biremis, Corp: Censured; Fined $50,000
Peter Beck: Fined $10,000; Suspended 6 weeks in Principal capacity only
Mello served as her member firm’s FINOP and was responsible for monitoring the firm’s financial condition to determine whether its net capital was sufficient to conduct a securities business. The firm’s registered representatives effected trades in collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) through the firm’s proprietary trading account. The transactions appeared to remove beneficial ownership of the CMOs from the firm, but they were sham transactions because the securities remained in the firm’s inventory.
The registered representative was able to accomplish and maintain his scheme because Mello and others at the firm reviewed his activity on a daily basis rather than in a manner that would evidence trading patterns over time and expose the firm’s losses and risk. As a result of the registered representative’s activity and the firm’s method of monitoring it, the firm conducted a securities business on multiple days while failing to maintain its required minimum net capital and, because Mello failed to discern the true effect of the registered representative’s trading on the firm’s net capital, she allowed the firm to conduct a securities business on multiple occasions while in violation of SEC Exchange Act Rule 15c3-1.
Acting through Baldwin, CMG Institutional Trading
Also, the firm permitted Baldwin to engage in its securities business even though his registration was inactive because he had failed to complete a continuing education course.
FINRA's National Adjudicatory Council (NAC) imposed these sanctions following appeal of an Office of Hearing Officers (OHO) decision:
CMG Institutional Trading, LLC: Expelled
Shawn Derrick Baldwin (Principal): Barred