Enforcement Actions
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
CASES OF NOTE
2010
NOTE: Stipulations of Fact and Consent to Penalty (SFC); Offers of Settlement (OS); and Letters of Acceptance Waiver, and Consent (AWC) are entered into by Respondents without admitting or denying the allegations, but consent is given to the described sanctions & to the entry of findings. Additionally, for AWCs, if FINRA has reason to believe a violation has occurred and the member or associated person does not dispute the violation, FINRA may prepare and request that the member or associated person execute a letter accepting a finding of violation, consenting to the imposition of sanctions, and agreeing to waive such member's or associated person's right to a hearing before a hearing panel, and any right of appeal to the National Adjudicatory Council, the SEC, and the courts, or to otherwise challenge the validity of the letter, if the letter is accepted. The letter shall describe the act or practice engaged in or omitted, the rule, regulation, or statutory provision violated, and the sanction or sanctions to be imposed.
February 2010 - View all for this month
Bruce Edward Hammonds
OS/2008013990501
Hammonds fraudulently induced his member firm’s customers and other investors to liquidate their positions or withdraw funds from their accounts and invest in excess of $1 million in a Ponzi scheme he orchestrated. Hammonds formed a partnership, and opened a partnership account that firm supervisors approved, but Hammond never disclosed the firm account on the firm’s electronic compliance disclosure system as an account in which he had an interest.

Hammonds told his customers and investors that his member firm would manage their investments, and he misrepresented the investment returns and the type of products  (indexed funds, futures contracts or securities) the partnership would invest in. He misappropriated the funds, using them to pay for personal expenses as well as to pay investor returns typical of Ponzi scheme. Hammonds provided customers and investors with fictitious account statements reporting growth in their investments.
Bruce Edward Hammonds : Barred
Tags: Ponzi    
Bill Singer's Comment
The only part of this case that I'm having a bit of trouble following is the bit about Hammonds opening a partnership account that his firm approved.  FINRA then alleges that notwithstanding that Hammonds formed the underlying partnership and opened the partnership account at his member, that he separately failed to disclose his beneficial interest in the partnership account on the firm’s electronic compliance disclosure system.

I wish FINRA would have clarified whether the member firm:
  1. caught the discrepancy between Hammonds' role with the partnership and his non-disclosure on the electronic form (and thus prompted Hammonds' detection);
  2. was aware of Hammonds' beneficial interest when he opened the account but never noticed the subsequent failure to disclose his status on the electronic form; or
  3. was unaware of Hammonds' formative role (and please explain what tipped his fraud -- perhaps nothing more complicated than a customer complaint?)
Enforcement Actions
Search in Cases of Note : FINRA
Months
 
Cases of Note : FINRA Archive
Tags