Enforcement Actions
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
CASES OF NOTE
2010
NOTE: Stipulations of Fact and Consent to Penalty (SFC); Offers of Settlement (OS); and Letters of Acceptance Waiver, and Consent (AWC) are entered into by Respondents without admitting or denying the allegations, but consent is given to the described sanctions & to the entry of findings. Additionally, for AWCs, if FINRA has reason to believe a violation has occurred and the member or associated person does not dispute the violation, FINRA may prepare and request that the member or associated person execute a letter accepting a finding of violation, consenting to the imposition of sanctions, and agreeing to waive such member's or associated person's right to a hearing before a hearing panel, and any right of appeal to the National Adjudicatory Council, the SEC, and the courts, or to otherwise challenge the validity of the letter, if the letter is accepted. The letter shall describe the act or practice engaged in or omitted, the rule, regulation, or statutory provision violated, and the sanction or sanctions to be imposed.
December 2010 - View all for this month
Daniel Lee Kurtz
AWC/2009020618301

Kurtz created a false document, which he labeled a “Contract Investment Summary,” that showed a balance of $9,193.36 in an account when the actual value at the time was less than $500, and placed his firm’s logo on the document without the firm authorizing his use of either the form of the document or the information contained in it. The false document was an intentional misrepresentation of the value of a 529 plan account established for Kurtz’ relative’s benefit.

Kurtz used the document when an opposing counsel in Kurtz’ divorce case informally, not as part of the divorce proceeding, inquired about the value of the 529 plan account, and Kurtz may not have had an obligation to respond to the inquiry.

Kurtz had withdrawn funds from the account to pay for household expenses and provided the document to the counsel in a manner that suggested that it was an authentic and official document of his firm.

Daniel Lee Kurtz : Fined $5,000; Suspended 6 months
Bill Singer's Comment

This one is certainly an oddball case.  On the one hand, I fully appreciate both FINRA and the employer firm's concern about the fabrication of the 529 plan documentation.  However, given that it was, essentially, Kurtz's plan and that the false document was provided to hiw wife's divorce lawyer in response to an "informal" request, I'm not exactly sure that the remedy here is for FINRA to suspend the guy for 6 months under the totality of the circumstances.  I'm still a bit uncomfortable with FINRA viewing this as a regulatory matter but not totally. Okay -- we'll call this a "push" and leave it at that.

Enforcement Actions
Search in Cases of Note : FINRA
Months
 
Cases of Note : FINRA Archive
Tags