[L]opez was the founder and president of Personal Money Management Company (PMMCO), which ostensibly provided financial management services to clients, many of whom were retired or near retirement. Beginning in 2014, Lopez held himself out as an investment advisor with considerable expertise who could consistently and substantially beat the market average return on investment.Lopez allegedly communicated to clients and prospective clients various false promises and misrepresentations related to his investment ability and strategy. As alleged in the indictment, Lopez falsely told clients and prospective clients that he could guarantee annual returns of 10 percent on their principal investment no matter how volatile the stock market might be, and that he could make an annualized 19.2-percent return on a retirement investment, in which clients would keep their initial principal investment as well. Lopez allegedly claimed that he had developed a computer program or algorithm that resulted in consistent and substantial above-average market returns on investments. He allegedly told clients and prospective clients that he would invest their money primarily in stocks and bonds, moving their money between those two investment instruments when market indicators or his computer algorithm told him to move them between the two.From February 2014 through November 2021, Lopez received approximately $19.4 million from clients. During that same period, rather than invest primarily in stocks and bonds, Lopez allegedly purchased $13.3 million in precious metals, such as gold and silver. Lopez disbursed approximately $6.1 million to clients, which he allegedly represented as investment gains.After securing client money, Lopez allegedly generated periodic account statements, purportedly showing substantial investment gains. For example, in November 2021, a client received a purported account statement reflecting that an investment of $200,000 with Lopez and PMMCO in 2016 had grown to $3,289,273, a 1,544-percent increase over an approximate five-year period. This growth calculation excluded a $565,000 withdrawal during 2021. In October 2021, those statements represented that PMMCO client account values were collectively worth approximately $39 million.On Nov. 9 and 10, 2021, government agents seized PMMCO assets, mostly comprising precious metals, which were valued at less than $15 million.Lopez allegedly continued to generate deceptive PMMCO account statements after the government seized PMMCO's assets. On May 31, 2022, those statements represented PMMCO client account values worth approximately $49 million.
[C]handran, Davidson, Glaspie, Knott, and Mossel falsely claimed that investors could generate extravagant returns by investing in a blockchain technology called CoinDeal that would be sold for trillions of dollars to a group of prominent and wealthy buyers. From at least January 2019 to 2022, Chandran, Davidson, Glaspie, Knott, and Mossel allegedly disseminated false and misleading statements to investors regarding the purported value of CoinDeal, the parties involved in the supposed sale of CoinDeal, and the use of investment proceeds. According to the complaint, no sale of CoinDeal ever occurred and no distributions were made to CoinDeal investors. The complaint further alleges that the defendants collectively misappropriated millions of dollars of investor funds for personal use, and that Chandran used investor funds to purchase items such as cars, real estate, and a boat.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2023/lr25607.htm
[H]ess schemed with co-defendants, including Michael Liberty, to induce investors to purchase unregistered interests in shell companies controlled by Michael Liberty that supposedly owned transferrable interests in a fintech startup then known as Mozido, LLC. In reality, the shell companies either did not own, or were not permitted to transfer, interests in the company. The SEC's complaint also alleged that Paul Hess and Michael Liberty lied to investors about Mozido's valuation and finances, the amount Michael Liberty had personally invested in Mozido, and the use of their funds. In total, Hess, Liberty, and the other co-defendants fraudulently raised more than $48 million from 2010 through 2016.
[S]tarting in 2013, Wexler and Bell, along with the other defendants, were involved in a scheme to manipulate the securities of CodeSmart Holdings, Inc. ("CodeSmart"). The SEC alleged that Wexler and others sought to flood the market with CodeSmart shares and engaged in a promotional campaign to artificially inflate the price of the stock. Meanwhile Bell and another individual invested their brokerage clients in CodeSmart. In short, the SEC alleged that the plan was for the defendants to profit at the expense of Bell's brokerage clients.
On March 23, 2021, Klickna affixed a customer's signature electronically on an annuity account application without the customer's consent. Further, on March 25, 2021, Klickna copied the same customer's signature and affixed it to a rollover form. The customer eventually noticed the forgery on the rollover form and complained to Equitable.Therefore, by forging the customer's electronic signature on the annuity account application and affixing the customer's signature on the rollover form, Klickna violated FINRA Rule 2010.In addition, by causing Equitable to maintain inaccurate books and records, Klickna violated FINRA Rules 4511 and 2010."
Bill Singer's Comment: Compliments to FINRA on a very well crafted AWC that sets out the allegations in a straightforward manner.Blaylock's Supervisory System was not Reasonably Designed to Detect Pre-Arranged Trading.From October 2016 through June 2021, Blaylock failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations prohibiting manipulative pre-arranged trading.Blaylock's WSPs prohibited pre-arranged trading, a form of manipulative trading. However, the firm's supervisory system failed to provide for reasonable surveillance or supervisory reviews for pre-arranged trading. A single supervisor conducted a daily review of the firm's trade blotter to identify potential pre-arranged trading. The daily trade blotter listed hundreds of transactions but did not associate transactions between potentially related customers - i.e., by name or account number that would assist the supervisor in identifying potential pre-arranged trading.In addition, the firm's WSPs did not provide guidance regarding how a supervisor was to identify or review for possible indicia of pre-arranged trading.Blaylock Failed to Detect Potential Pre-Arranged Trading.Between October 2016 and April 2017, Blaylock executed 34 pairs of municipal securities transactions on a principal basis with two institutional customers that were under common control. In these instances, the customers directed a Blaylock representative to buy from one customer and then sell the same bonds to the other customer at prices that were agreed to by the customers.2 The customers would trade the bonds back and forth sometimes at increasing prices that were between three and twelve points above the prevailing market price.As a result of the firm's failure to have a reasonably designed supervisory system, the firm did not detect the pre-arranged trading pattern even though the transactions appeared on the firm's daily trade blotter. The trading stopped in April 2017, when one of the two customers refused to pay for bonds purchased from Blaylock. The firm immediately closed the customers' accounts and sold the bonds into the marketplace for a monetary loss.By failing to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including WSPs, reasonably designed to detect and prevent pre-arranged trading, Blaylock violated MSRB Rule G-27.= = =Footnote 2: In some instances, the pattern of trading commenced with one customer selling the bonds to Blaylock.
Between in or about June 2021 and in or about August 2022, MORGENTHAU, who was the CFO of SPAC-1 and SPAC-2, embezzled more than $5 million from the two companies. SPAC-1 had recently had its initial public offering, while SPAC-2 was raising money from private investors in preparation for its anticipated IPO. MORGENTHAU used the embezzled funds to trade equities and options of so-called "meme stocks" and cryptocurrencies, losing almost all of the money that he stole. To conceal and facilitate his embezzlement from SPAC-1, MORGENTHAU fabricated bank statements, which he provided to SPAC-1's accountant and auditor; made and caused to be made material misstatements in SPAC-1's public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"); and transferred some of SPAC-2's funds to SPAC-1 to cover up the funds he had misappropriated from SPAC-1.
[F]om June 2021 through July 2022, Morgenthau embezzled money from African Gold and stole funds from another SPAC series called Strategic Metals Acquisition Corp. I and II to pay for his personal expenses and to trade in crypto assets and other securities.SEC Obtains Final Judgment Against Individual Behind Bogus Tender Offer (SEC Release)
According to the SEC's complaint, Morgenthau concealed unauthorized withdrawals by falsifying African Gold's bank account statements and then provided those falsified documents to African Gold's auditor and accountants for purposes of preparing African Gold's SEC filings. During the same general time period, Morgenthau raised money from Strategic Metals' investors based on misrepresentations that the money would be used to launch the Strategic Metals SPACs, when in fact Morgenthau misappropriated the money for personal uses, including to conceal his embezzlement of African Gold's funds.
fraud for orchestrating a phony offer to purchase a major U.S. aircraft, defense, and industrial company.The SEC's complaint was filed on April 5, 2022. The complaint alleged that ten Cate and his now-defunct private company, Xcalibur Aerospace, Ltd., placed an advertisement in The New York Times announcing a proposed plan to purchase all existing stock of Textron, Inc., at a 56% premium over the stock's previous closing price. The announcement allegedly contained a number of false and misleading statements about Xcalibur's size and financial condition and failed to disclose that ten Cate and entities he controlled had been the subject of multiple bankruptcy and default judgments.