[O]n June 18, 2019, agents from U.S. Customs and Border Protection intercepted two large packages that had been shipped from China. Each package was found to contain a barrel of blue capsules. An invoice for one of the barrels claimed that the capsules contained "Shiitake Mushroom Extract." The packages were addressed to "Dr. Seltzer, LLC, Tim DeJoris" at an address in Ponte Vedra. The capsules were tested and found to contain sildenafil, the active ingredient in Viagra and other prescription medications used to treat erectile dysfunction in men. A search of a CPB database reflected that a similar shipment, described in the same way, had been delivered to DeJoris from the same supplier in China on June 11, 2019.During the course of the investigation, investigators discovered a website with the address of "hardonhelper.com" that sold "Dr. Seltzer's Hard-On Helper," which was claimed to be a "100% Natural Male Enhancement Dietary Supplement." Investigators also discovered that, in addition to being sold on that website, the capsules were also being sold on Amazon and eBay. The price on all three websites was the same, one capsule for $10.99, six capsules for $52.99, eight capsules for $61.99, and twelve capsules for $79.99. The product was also being sold at Adam and Eve adult stores in the Jacksonville area.Records obtained from Amazon reflected that, for the period of January 1 through August 6, 2019, there were 8,043 sales of the capsules for a total of $453,413.07.When investigators questioned DeJoris about the shipments, he said that he had paid $4,000 for each shipment of 50,000 capsules. Investigators seized over 25,000 capsules from DeJoris and his business partner.
[M]cGonigle served as a financial advisor for the elderly victims. Beginning no later than February 2015, McGonigle allegedly caused unauthorized withdrawals from victims' annuities and induced victims to give him money to invest on their behalf, which he then used for personal and business expenses. To carry out his scheme, McGonigle allegedly posed as clients on calls with their annuity companies and signed their names on forms requesting withdrawals from their annuities.
In late 2009, MOORE partnered with Renwick Haddow, who is also a British citizen, to sell investments in a hotel scheme in which investors lost money. Haddow had been disqualified as a director of any U.K. company for eight years, and later sued by the Financial Conduct Authority, a British regulator, for operating investment schemes through misrepresentations that lost investors substantially all of their money. These sanctions and lawsuit were publicized extensively online.Beginning in 2015, MOORE chose to partner with Haddow again, this time to solicit investments into Bar Works through material misrepresentations concerning, among other things, the identity of Bar Works' management and the financial condition of that company.In order to conceal his role at Bar Works because of the negative publicity on the internet related to past investment schemes and government sanctions in the United Kingdom, Haddow adopted the alias "Jonathan Black." Notwithstanding Haddow's control over Bar Works, Moore and others knowingly distributed the Bar Works offering materials listing Black as the chief executive officer of Bar Works and claiming that Black had an extensive background in finance and past success with start-up companies. As MOORE well knew, "Jonathan Black," was an entirely fictitious person, created to mask Haddow's control of Bar Works.Among other things, MOORE helped devise and distribute pitch materials that contained the misrepresentations. MOORE and an affiliated Spanish-based company, United Property Group, coordinated a substantial sales force to recruit investors knowing that the materials contained the falsehood. MOORE advised Haddow as to how to continue to conceal the truth concerning the identity of "Jonathan Black," and affirmatively represented to potential sales partners that he was communicating with CEO "Jonathan Black." MOORE also advised Haddow how to evade foreign law enforcement authorities. MOORE personally received approximately $1.6 million from Bar Works before helping to launch a competing co-working space investment project.MOORE repeatedly lied to the United States Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and federal law enforcement agents to cover up his role in the Bar Works scheme. On August 11, 2016 - while the Bar Works scheme was still operating - MOORE participated in a recorded phone interview with the SEC and reiterated that Jonathan Black was a real person who he understood to be the CEO of Bar Works, notwithstanding knowing that Black was fake. MOORE claimed that he never asked to speak to Jonathan Black, even though in the prior months, MOORE had been misrepresented to multiple agents that he was working closely with Black.On February 15, 2017, MOORE was interviewed by Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agents following his arrest for a separate investment scheme in connection with a development project he was promoting in Florida. In a videotaped interview, MOORE lied and told agents he had not done anything for money since 2010, even though he had gotten approximately $1.6 million from Bar Works alone.Moore's conviction is his second federal felony conviction related to property investments. He was previously convicted in 2018 of misprision of a felony for his role in a property investment fraud in Florida, for which he was sentenced to 18 months in prison.In addition to the prison term, MOORE, 60, was sentenced to 3 years of supervised release. MOORE was also ordered to pay restitution of $57,579,790.00, forfeiture of $1,599,257.46, and a fine of $50,000.Renwick Haddow, 53, pled guilty on May 23, 2019, to one count each of wire fraud and wire fraud conspiracy relating to the Bar Works scheme, and one count each of wire fraud and wire fraud conspiracy relating to a separate investment scheme involving Bitcoins. Haddow's sentencing is scheduled for April 8, 2022.Savraj Gata-Aura, 35, pled guilty on November 18, 2019, to one count of wire fraud conspiracy for his participation in the scheme, and was sentenced to 48 months in prison on July 27, 2020, by Judge Jed. S. Rakoff.
[F]rom December 2017 through at least July 2021, Safeguard and Santulan acted as investment advisers and persuaded investors to sell their existing securities, transfer the proceeds into self-directed Individual Retirement Accounts, and invest the proceeds into gold and silver coins by making false and misleading statements about the safety and liquidity of the investors' securities investments, Safeguard's business, and its compensation.As alleged, Safeguard fraudulently marketed itself as a full-service investment firm with offices in London, New York City, and Beverly Hills that employed prominent individuals in the securities industry and had $11 billion in assets under management. In reality, Santulan allegedly operated the company from a small leased space in a Woodland Hills, Calif. office building using sales agents. The complaint further alleges that Safeguard's sales agents used prepared scripts, some written by Santulan, that were filled with false and misleading statements about how the market was going to crash and how their retirement accounts would be frozen under a new 'unpublicized' law.. . .Safeguard and Santulan also allegedly misled investors about Safeguard's commissions and markups on the coins, charging average markups of approximately 64% on its sales of silver coins, instead of the 4% to 33% markups that they disclosed to investors. According to the complaint, Safeguard obtained approximately $67 million from the sale of coins to more than 450 mostly elderly, retail investors, and kept approximately $25.5 million in mark ups.
Mollura took the Series 66 qualification examination on January 5, 2021. Prior to beginning the examination, Mollura attested that he had read and would abide by the Rules of Conduct, which require candidates to store all personal items in the locker provided by the test vendor prior to entering the test room, and prohibit any use, attempted use, or access to personal items, including study materials, during the examination. During the examination, Mollura possessed and took notes on personal paper. Therefore, Mollura violated FINRA Rules 1210.05 and 2010.
On April 7, 2021, Andrew took the Series 66 Investment Advisor examination. Prior tothe examination, Andrew attested that he had read and would abide by the FINRAQualification Examinations Rules of Conduct, which among other things, prohibits theuse or attempted use of phones during the exam. The Rules of Conduct also requirecandidates to "store all personal items in the locker provided by the test vendor prior toentering the test room." During an unscheduled break, Andrew possessed and had access to his cellular phone which contained study materials for the exam, in violation of the Rules of Conduct. Therefore, Andrew violated FINRA Rules 1210.05 and 2010.
Between December 2019 and February 2020, Bright executed 149 transactions in 58 customer accounts in connection with switching certain of his customers' assets between mutual fund families. Bright made these transactions based on communications with his customers that occurred three or more days before he placed the trades. Although Bright discussed the mutual fund switching strategy with the customers, he did not speak with the customers about the specific trades on the dates of the transactions. Additionally, Edward Jones had not approved any of these accounts for discretionary trading.Therefore, Respondent violated FINRA Rules 3260(b) and 2010.
In the Amended Statement of Claim, Claimant requested compensatory damages on each of the contract claims in an amount no less than $6,197,628.20; compensatory and double damages as a result of Respondent's violations of Article 6 of the New York Labor Law in an amount no less than $12,395,256.40; presumed/ assumed damages on the claim for defamation per se in an amount no less than $5,000,000.00; compensatory damages on the claim for defamation per se in an amount no less than $5,000,000.00; punitive/exemplary damages on the claims for defamation and defamation per se in an amount no less than $5,000,000.00; a declaration that Respondent terminated Claimant on May 22, 2019 without "Cause,"; a declaration that Respondent materially breached the Employment Agreement when it terminated Claimant on May 22, 2019; alternatively, a declaration that Respondent breached the Employment Agreement when it terminated Claimant on May 22, 2019; alternatively, a declaration that Respondent breached the Employment Agreement's implied covenants of good faith and fairing dealing when it terminated Claimant on May 22, 2019 and failed to employ and compensate Claimant pursuant to the Employment Agreement through March 16, 2022; an order expunging in its entirety the Form 8T that Respondent filed with the National Futures Association ("NFA") on June 25, 2019; alternatively, an order expunging the false information that is contained in the Form 8T filed with the NFA on June 25, 2019, and requiring that (1) the "Internal Review Disclosure" response (i.e., Response B) on page 6 of the Form 8T be changed to "NO,"; (2) the first two "Termination Disclosure" responses (i.e., Responses F(1) and F(2)) on page 9 of the Form 8T be changed to "NO,"; (3) all of the information and disclosures on page 11 of the Form 8T be stricken, deleted, and expunged in their entirety, and (4) the response to "Matter Information Page will be completed" on page 9 of the Form 8T be changed to "NO"; attorneys' fees, pre-judgement, and post-judgement interest on all amounts awarded, costs, disbursements, and expenses; and such other or further relief as the Panel deems just and proper
In the FINRA arbitration captioned Ryan Bernardini vs. GFI Securities LLC (FINRA No. 19- 02513) the Panel determined that there was insufficient evidence to prove that Claimant Bernardini provided false information to mislead market participants or mislead GFI's investigators.
The parties entered into an agreement to present to the Panel a Stipulated Award. Now, in lieu of a hearing and upon motion of both parties for entry of a Stipulated Award, and the written stipulation thereto, the Panel grants the motion and enters this Stipulated Award granting the following relief:1. After reviewing the pleadings and other documents submitted before this Panel (including a June 15, 2021 correspondence sent directly from Allstate to Claimants in this Action requiring an Order from this Panel) as well the oral arguments presented by the parties, we determine that Allstate (which includes Prudential Financial, Inc. or any other institution currently servicing or administering the products at issue) shall promptly surrender and immediately distribute all funds pertaining to the annuity contracts AC3100007A and ALL0138250 to the beneficiaries of record of said policies, David Epstein and Ethan Epstein. This arbitration award may be confirmed by a court of competent jurisdiction if needed or required. Each Party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs related to this arbitration. This award in no way constitutes any finding of fault or liability on the part of either Claimants or Respondent.