Securities Industry Commentator by Bill Singer Esq

May 26, 2021


 
2021 Industry Snapshot (FINRA Report)
https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/Industry_Snapshot_2021_v6.pdf
An annual report or the draft eulogy for an upcoming funeral? Consider the dour disclosures on page 12 of the FINRA Report that the total number of FINRA member firms dropped from 3,835 in 2016 to 3,435 in 2020 -- and that's not even taking into consideration the likely carnage in 2021 of the ongoing Covid pandemic. Among the more eye-opening bits of data for the period of 2016 through 2020:

  • "Small Firms" (1 to 150 registered representatives) fell from 3,462 in 2016 to 3,079 -- a loss of 383 firms or about an 11% loss. 
  • "Mid-Size Firms" (151 to 499 registered representatives) fell from 194 to 191 firms  -- a loss of 3 firms or about a 1 1/2% loss; and 
  • "Large Firms" (500 or more registered representatives) fell from 179 to 165 firms -- a loss of 14 firms or about an 8% loss.


In a Complaint filed in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2021/comp25097.pdf, the SEC charged Randy R. King, Matthew B. King, Andrea S. Trout, The Legacy Group, Inc., Colorado Ventures I, LLC, and Radiant Holdings, LLC
 with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Complaint further charged Trout with violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act; and charged the Kings, Trout, and Legacy with violating the securities registration provisions of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. Without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint, the Defendants consented to judgments enjoining them from violating the charged provisions of the securities laws, imposing conduct-based injunctions, and ordering Randy King to pay $174,318 in disgorgement, $6,056 in prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty of 195,000; Matthew King to pay disgorgement of $89,438 plus $9,097 in prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty of $150,000; Trout to pay $23,509 in disgorgement, $1,637 in prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty of $125,000; and Legacy to pay $416,859 in disgorgement and $85,867 in prejudgment interest. As alleged in part in the SEC Release:

[T]he defendants raised money to fund residential and small-scale commercial real estate projects, primarily in California and Colorado. Legacy, the Kings, and Trout allegedly defrauded investors by raising money for specific projects and then using the funds on other projects. They also allegedly materially misstated the risks of certain investments, including by misrepresenting the amount of investments already associated with the project. The SEC's complaint also alleges that the Kings, with respect to Colorado Ventures and Radiant, defrauded investors by misusing certain investor funds, which were earmarked for specific projects, but used instead on other projects and/or redirected to the Kings, personally.

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2021/lr25098.htm
Without admitting or denying the allegations of the SEC's complaint, Kai Christian Petersen, Gil Beserglik and Raz Beserglik consented to the entry of final judgments in the United States District Court for the Central District of California enjoining them from violating the registration provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act and Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. 

The three Defendants consented to conduct-based injunctions that prohibit them from offering, selling, causing others to offer or sell, or profiting from the sale of binary options, securities-based swaps, or other securities over the internet, and to associational and penny stock bars. Petersen agreed to pay $200,296 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, and a $100,000 civil penalty. Gil Beserglik agreed to pay $2,347,224 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, and a $300,000 civil penalty. Raz Beserglik agreed to pay $2,086,421 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, and a $465,000 civil penalty. As alleged in part in the SEC Release:

[B]etween October 2014 and August 2017, Kai Christian Petersen, Gil Beserglik and Raz Beserglik owned, controlled, and operated three unregistered binary option brokers named Bloombex Options, Morton Finance, and Startling Capital, which together defrauded U.S. and foreign investors out of tens of millions of dollars. According to the complaint, the brokers controlled by the defendants utilized call centers in Germany and Israel that operated as "boiler rooms," in which salespersons used high pressure sales tactics to offer and sell speculative and fraudulent binary options to investors. Employees at these call centers allegedly lied about their names, locations and expertise in trading securities, and falsely told investors that the brokers only earned money if investors made money. In reality, the brokers earned money only from investor losses and thus had no incentive to advise investors on how to trade binary options profitably. The complaint alleged that most investors who traded binary options through the three brokers lost money, and some retirees lost their entire savings. The complaint also alleged that none of the defendants registered with the SEC as brokers or dealers.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-requires-divestitures-huntington-bancshares-incorporated-s-acquisition-t-0
In order to resolve concerns of DOJ's Antitrust Division, Huntington Bancshares Incorporated and TCF Financial Corporation agreed to sell 13 branches in Michigan, with approximately $872.3 million in deposits, arising from Huntington's planned acquisition of TCF Bank. The DOJ Release asserts in part that:

Under the agreement with the Justice Department, the parties will divest branches in Michigan, located in Arenac, Charlevoix, Crawford, Newaygo, Otsego, Mecosta, Shiawassee, Wexford and Missaukee counties, and in the City of Midland. The companies also have agreed to suspend existing, and not to enter into new, non-compete agreements with branch managers and loan officers located in the divestiture counties for a period of 180 days following the consummation of their merger. Further, the companies have agreed that any traditional branches located in any overlap market in Michigan and Ohio that are closed within three years of the merger's closing will be sold or leased to an insured depository institution that offers deposit and credit services to small businesses. As a result of the acquisition, Huntington will become the 25th largest bank holding company based on assets.

The proposed merger is subject to the final approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The department's role when reviewing a proposed bank merger necessarily focuses on the merger's competitive effects. Here, the department has advised the Federal Reserve Board that the department will not challenge the merger provided that the parties divest branches in certain areas of overlap and agree that any traditional branches in Michigan and in the five overlapping counties in Ohio that are closed within three years following the merger, will be marketed to an institution with a demonstrated record of providing services and loans to the local community. The parties' commitments to the department are included as a condition to the Federal Reserve Board Order allowing the transaction.

Huntington is the holding company of The Huntington National Bank, Columbus, Ohio, with approximately $120 billion in assets. Huntington has 839 full-service branches across seven Midwestern states. Huntington provides a wide range of banking and other financial services to consumers, businesses and wealth management customers.

TCF is the holding company of TCF National Bank, Detroit, Michigan, and has approximately $48 billion in assets. TCF has 475 branches primarily located in Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota. TCF also provides a broad array of consumer and business banking services, along with other services like wealth management and specialty leasing services, to its customers.

Tampa Man Sentenced To Prison For Manufacturing Counterfeit Federal Reserve Notes While On Federal Supervised Release (DOJ Release)
https://www.justice.gov/usao-mdfl/pr/tampa-man-sentenced-prison-manufacturing-counterfeit-federal-reserve-notes-while
Darius Jondi Edwards, 42, pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida to violating the terms of his federal supervised release, and he was sentenced to four years and three months in prison. As alleged in part in the DOJ Release:
Jacksonville, Florida - United States District Judge Brian J. Davis has sentenced Darius Jondi 

[I]n 2015 Edwards pleaded guilty in federal court in Jacksonville to charges he manufactured counterfeit Federal Reserve notes (i.e., counterfeit currency), that he and others passed throughout the Jacksonville area.  Edwards was sentenced to 33 months in federal prison, followed by 3 years of supervised release.

After his release from prison in October 2019, and while still on federal supervised release for those prior counterfeiting charges, the Pinellas Park Police Department arrested Edwards for possession of counterfeit currency and forging/making counterfeit bank bills. During the course of arresting Edwards at a hotel, law enforcement found him to be in possession of counterfeit currency, partially completed counterfeit currency, and computer media used to manufacture counterfeit Federal Reserve notes. Follow up investigation by the United States Secret Service determined that Edwards had purchased the computer media used to manufacture the counterfeit notes in Duval County and then transported the computer media to Pinellas County, where he manufactured the counterfeit Federal Reserve notes.    


https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/farmington-woman-admits-stealing-103k-bank-customer
Lee  Blanchette pled guilty in the District of Connecticut to one count of bank fraud and agreed to pay restitution. As alleged in part in the DOJ Release:

[B]lanchette was employed by Bank of America as a relationship manager.  As a relationship manager, Blanchette had the authority to cause temporary ATM cards to be activated and assigned to a customer's account.  Between August 2014 and March 2016, Blanchette caused multiple temporary ATM cards to be activated for bank accounts of a customer who Blanchette knew was experiencing cognitive decline.  Without the customer's authorization, Blanchette used the temporary ATM cards to withdraw significant funds from the customer's accounts, keeping a significant portion for her own benefit, and causing a loss of $103,080.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/two-cargo-handlers-lax-arrested-alleged-theft-gold-bars
Cargo handlers Marlon Moody and Brian Benson were charged in an Indictment filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of Californian wih conspiracy and theft of interstate and foreign shipment. As alleged in part in the DOJ Release:

[B]oth men worked for Alliance Ground International, a company that provided ground handling services at LAX. On the evening of April 22, 2020, a shipment of gold bars arrived at LAX on Singapore Airlines. A total of 2,000 gold bars, each weighing one kilogram and valued at approximately $56,000, were being shipped at the direction of a Canadian bank. During a stopover at LAX, the gold was offloaded and secured, but an inventory that evening showed one box containing 25 gold bars was missing.

Moody allegedly found the missing box of gold bars near the Singapore Airlines cargo warehouse on the morning of April 23, placed the box on a belt loader and drove that vehicle to a nearby location, where he removed four of the bars. Soon after, Benson arrived to pick up Moody in a company van, where they exchanged text messages about the gold bars because other employees were in the van. The two defendants later left the airport and went to a nearby parking lot, where Moody gave Benson one of the four gold bars, the indictment states.

The lost box with the 21 remaining gold bars was discovered by other cargo handlers later on April 23, and authorities began an investigation that ultimately led to Moody and Benson.

Moody gave one gold bar to a relative on May 4 "and directed the family member to exchange the gold bar for a vehicle and/or money," according to the indictment. Around this time, Moody buried the remaining two gold bars in the backyard of his residence.

The FBI recovered all four gold bars about two weeks after they went missing from LAX.


http://www.brokeandbroker.com/5868/finra-expungement/
Some things are debatable. For example, when public customers complain about misconduct by their stockbroker, there may be some points raised in the Complaint or Answer that may, or may not, be true. That's where the adversarial system comes into play and we rely upon a panel of arbitrators to sift through the evidence. On the other hand, some things aren't debatable -- the facts speak for themselves and dispel any notion of uncertainty. In a recent FINRA arbitration, it seems that the stockbroker had done no wrong. Worse, he blew the whistle on the bad guy. Why then did that whistleblower need to bear the burden of filing for an expungement? Why didn't FINRA step in and do the right thing, at its own cost?xx