]M]cCord admitted to defrauding Spirit Bank ("Spirit") and Citizens State Bank ("Citizens")-two state-chartered financial institutions-as well as their respective residential mortgage subsidiaries, American Southwest Mortgage Corporation ("Mortgage Corp.") and American Southwest Mortgage Funding Corporation ("Funding Corp."). An independent audit discovered that McCord had sold more than $14,100,000.00 in Spirit/Mortgage Corp. and Citizens/Funding Corp. loans "out of trust" by failing to repay Spirit/Mortgage Corp. when certain Spirit/Mortgage Corp.-initiated loans were refinanced or otherwise paid off. At the time of this discovery, FMC carried outstanding balances of about $200,000,000.00 and $140,000,000.00 on the Spirit/Mortgage Corp. and Citizens/Funding Corp. lines of credit, respectively.Upon learning of McCord's conduct, Spirit/Mortgage Corp. and Citizens/Funding Corp. terminated future warehouse lending to FMC, and instituted new notification requirements that required McCord to assign FMC-funded mortgages to Spirit/Mortgage Corp. and Citizens/Funding Corp., to ensure the title companies handling those mortgages sent payoffs directly to the banks. McCord admitted at yesterday's plea hearing that he filed the assignments as required, but then caused the mortgages to be released on two properties-in Leland and Denver, North Carolina-after collecting the mortgage payoffs.Spirit/Mortgage Corp. and Citizens/Funding Corp.'s refusal to fund new FMC mortgages prompted McCord to seek out a new warehouse lender. In early 2017, McCord began negotiating with CapLOC, LLC, a North Carolina-based mortgage lending business, and offered to sell FMC's mortgage lending business in exchange for quick funding from CapLOC. At yesterday's plea hearing, McCord admitted that he made a materially false statement and representation to CapLOC in the course of those negotiations, in order to influence CapLOC's actions.Finally, in 2017, FMC serviced approximately 12,000 loans worth a total of approximately $1,800,000,000.00 for the Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"). McCord admitted at the plea hearing that he defrauded Fannie Mae by diverting escrow monies intended to pay homeowners' taxes and insurance premiums to cover FMC's operating expenses. McCord also admitted that he then laundered the proceeds by causing a wire transfer from FMC's operating account to a custom home builder, as payment towards construction of McCord's home in Colorado.
In September 2020, while he was registered through WFCS, Sam borrowed $230,000 from a WFCS customer (Customer 1). WFCS's written supervisory procedures only allowed its registered representatives to borrow from customers who were immediate family members, and only after obtaining the firm's prior written approval. Sam and Customer were not related, and Sam did not seek WFCS's approval before obtaining the loan.Sam and Customer 1 each had lawyers represent them in negotiating and drafting documents to formalize the loan agreement. The terms of the loan require Sam to make monthly interest payments of 8% for one year, after which time he is required to repay the entire principal amount. To date, Sam has made all required payments.
At all relevant times, Morgan Stanley authorized employees to seek and obtain reimbursement for certain types of expenses, including expenses incurred during business meals with customers. To seek reimbursement for those expenses, the firm required employees to identify on their expense reports the names of all the individuals who attended the meals. Between January 2018 and May 2019. Respondent incurred actual expenses during business meals with customers. However, during that period, Respondent submitted expense reports and received reimbursement for multiple meals, which collectively cost approximately $1,600, in which Respondent inaccurately stated that particular customers attended, even though they were not present.
[R]espondent prepared tax returns for a firm customer every year from 2014 to 2019, in exchange for compensation, without disclosing that activity to the firm. When the firm commenced interviews with Respondent about this conduct, Respondent falsely told the firm that she had not prepared tax returns for any firm customer. However, Respondent subsequently acknowledged to the firm that she had engaged in the activity.