|
|
|
In
the Matter of the Association of X as a General Securities Principal
with the Sponsoring Firm MC-400:
December 2001 Redacted
Decision |
APPROVED without hearing upon the recommendation of the Department of Member Regulation in accordance with NASD Procedural Rule 9523 |
|
SD Event |
1993 Class A Misdemeanor resulting in three years probation |
|
Sentence expiration |
Discharged from probation 1996 |
|
Prior Industry Activity |
General
securities representative and Series 63 in 1996. GSP 2000. Employed
in industry from 1996 to 1998 without going through SD process.
|
|
Background |
The
disqualifying event occurred when X was pledging a fraternity in his
senior year of college. The
pledges were asked to go to a sorority
dormitory on campus and retrieve a "a pledge
plaque." While X
and several other pledges were in the dorm, apparently other things
were taken, along with a woman's pocketbook containing cash. X
subject to two customer complaints in 2001 that were investigated by
NASD without further action. X
was employed in industry for more than one year following his
disqualification in apparent violation of SD process.
NASD noted his Form U-4 disclosed conviction but CRD failed
to forward SD notification until 1998 because the Forms U-4
mistakenly mentioned only the theft of property (the sorority pledge
plaque) and not the theft of currency as the basis for the 1993
misdemeanor conviction. |
|
Sponsoring Firm |
NASD
member since 1996. Investment banking and marketing of securities.
No OSJs and no branches. Employs
11 registered principals, 38 RRs and 44 employees. AWC $500 fine/Censure for net capital violation. LOC for CE
deficiency. LOC for
failure to comply with SD provisions for inadequate records of
correspondence review and new account opening (supervisor
subsequently resigned). for trade reporting.
Firm does not employ any other SDs. |
|
Proposed Activity |
X
to be employed in Firm’s retail sales office as a general
securities principal responsible for sales supervision and retail
broker training. Compensation
is commissions and a percentage override.. |
|
Proposed Supervisor |
EVP
in home office. Has
Series 7, 63 and 24. GSP
1996. In industry since
1995. No regulatory history. In
Proposed Supervisor’s absence, Firm’s CFO will substitue.
GSP since 1999 with no regulatory history. |
|
Member Regulation Recommendation |
Permitted |
|
Considerations |
X’s disqualification occurred 9 years ago without recurrence. Proposed supervision adequate, notwithstanding SD exam issue in 2000 (specific note taken of replacement of supervisor). X and Proposed Supervisor not related by blood or marriage. UNDERTAKINGS 1.
X will conduct securities business on behalf of the Sponsoring Firm only
from the office where Proposed Supervisor 2 is physically located; 2.
X will act as a principal, specifically involved with sales training
and supervision of registered representatives; 3.
The supervisory procedures of the Sponsoring Firm shall be amended
clearly to establish Proposed Supervisor 2's responsibility to
supervise X. In Proposed Supervisor 2's absence, X will be
supervised by Proposed Supervisor 3;
4.
X will not maintain
discretionary accounts at any time;
5.
The review of New Account Forms will include a review
for suitability;
6.
Proposed Supervisor 2 will review and approve all of X's order
tickets on a daily basis. Proposed Supervisor 2 will
review X's incoming and
outgoing correspondence at the time that they are either
received or sent; 7.
Proposed Supervisor 2 will keep a written record evidencing review
and approval of all of X's transactions, the opening of new
accounts, and all correspondence; 8.
X will be prohibited from
accepting funds from customers in his name. Rather, all
funds must be payable to either the Firm or the particular fund.
The Firm will develop a procedure to compare
X's customer requests for disbursement to monthly statements;
9.
All complaints
pertaining to X, whether verbal or written, will be immediately
referred to Proposed Supervisor 2 for review, and then to the Firm's
Director of Compliance. Proposed Supervisor 2 will prepare a
memorandum to the file as to what measures he took to investigate
the merits of the complaint (e.g., contact with the customer) and
the resolution of the matter. Documents pertaining to these
complaints should be kept segregated for ease of review; 10.
X will be required to attend an annual compliance meeting, and
evidence of his attendance will be kept segregated in a file for
easy review; and
11.
For the duration of X's statutory disqualification, the Sponsoring
Firm must obtain prior approval from Member Regulation if it wishes
to change X's responsible supervisor from Proposed Supervisor 2 to
another person. |
|
Citations |
|
RRBDLAW.COM AND SECURITIES INDUSTRY COMMENTATOR™ © 2004 BILL SINGER THE ARTICLES PUBLISHED HERE REPRESENT THE PERSONAL VIEWS OF THE AUTHOR, AND NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OF ANY LAW FIRM OR ORGANIZATION WITH WHICH HE MAY BE AFFILIATED. ALL STATEMENTS MADE IN THESE ARTICLES ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE, NOR SHOULD THEY BE RELIED ON AS, LEGAL ADVICE. READERS MUST CONSULT WITH QUALIFIED LEGAL COUNSEL BEFORE RELYING UPON ANY CONTENT CONTAINED HEREIN. STATEMENTS MADE IN THESE ARTICLES MAY BE INCORRECT FOR YOUR JURISDICTION OR AT THE TIME WHEN YOU READ SUCH STATEMENTS THE UNDERLYING RULES, REGULATIONS AND/OR DECISIONS MAY NO LONGER BE CONTROLLING OR PERSUASIVE AS A MATTER OF LAW OR INTERPRETATION. Telephone: 917-520-2836 Secondary telephone: 212-269-1400 Fax at 720-559-2800 E-mail to rrbdlawyer@aol.com FOR DETAILS ABOUT MR. SINGER, PLEASE READ HIS ONLINE BIOGRAPHY |