|
|
 |
|
NOTE:
Offers of Settlement (OS) and Letters of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent (AWC)
are entered into by Respondents without admitting or denying the
allegations, but consent is given to the described sanctions and to the
entry of findings.
FINANCIAL
INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
FINRA
2008
Continuing Education
see the NASD Continuing Education Rule
|
Katherine Patricia Kozub
OS/2005003511203/June 2008
Kozub completed a Firm Element
Continuing Education test on another registered representative’s behalf
in violation of NASD rules.
Katherine Patricia Kozub: Fined $5,000; Suspended 30 days
|
Kershner Trading Group, LLC
AWC/2007007163501/May 2008
The Firm allowed registered representatives to conduct a securities
business while their registrations were deemed inactive due to their
failure to timely complete the Regulatory Element of the Continuing
Education requirement.
Kershner Trading Group, LLC: Censured; Fined $10,000
|
Seslia Securities
AWC/2007007154201/April 2008
The Firm failed to retain
instant messages in violation of Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Rule 17a-4, and failed to maintain records documenting the content
of its continuing education
programs (firm element) and covered registered persons’ completion of
the programs.
Seslia Securities: Censured; Fined $17,500
|
State Farm VP Management Representatives
March 6, 2008 FINRA Press Release
FINRA Fines, Suspends 16 State Farm Representatives for Test-Taking
Irregularities in the Firm's Continuing Education Program/Supervisors
Directed or Allowed Registered Representatives of State Farm VP Management
Corp. to Take "Firm Element" Proficiency Tests for Supervisors
or Other Representatives
FINRA fined and suspended 16 current and former registered
representatives of State Farm VP Management Corp. of Bloomington, IL
(which is engaged in the business of selling mutual funds and variable
products) for misconduct involving FINRA's Continuing Education
requirements for registered representatives.
The representatives engaged in this misconduct without any
authorization from State Farm. State Farm reported the misconduct to FINRA
after uncovering test-taking irregularities in one of its regions and
conducting a preliminary investigation. State Farm then expanded its
internal investigation nationwide and provided FINRA with its findings.The
Continuing Education requirements consist of a Regulatory Element and a
Firm Element. The Regulatory Element requires all registered persons to
take computer-based training, devoted to industry rules and regulations,
on the second anniversary of their initial securities registration and
every three years thereafter. The Firm Element requires firms to
administer appropriate training to their registered persons who have
direct contact with customers, and to the registered persons' immediate
supervisors, on an ongoing basis. The training must cover topics
specifically related to their business, such as new products, sales
practices, risk disclosure, and new regulatory requirements and concerns.
The 2005 Firm Element designed by State Farm was an internal,
computer-based system. Covered representatives were required to complete a
two-hour training session and then pass a proficiency test with a minimum
score of 80%. In order to access the Firm Element training session and
proficiency test, the participant was required to sign on to the system
using a user ID and password. The subordinate representatives who took the
test for their superiors signed on as the superiors for whom they were
taking the test, using the superiors' user IDs and passwords.
One sanctioned representative, a former registered principal of the
firm, Rebecca Sappington directed
a subordinate to obtain the user IDs and passwords of at least four State
Farm registered representatives working in her area, and complete
the Firm Element program for these representatives by taking their
proficiency tests. When Sappington learned that her directive had not been
carried out, she instructed her subordinate to delegate the task to
another person, who was an unregistered and newly hired employee of State
Farm. This unregistered person then obtained the user IDs and passwords
for at least four representatives, logged onto the system and completed
the Firm Element program for the representatives by taking their
proficiency tests.
In concluding these settlements, the registered representatives neither
admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA's
findings. The individuals agreed to the following sanctions:
Series 26 Principals who directed
a subordinate to take their proficiency tests:
- Todd Rindfuss received a $10,000 fine, a six-month suspension as a
principal and a 90-day suspension in all capacities.
- Michael Stansbury received a $10,000 fine, a six-month suspension as
a principal and a 90-day suspension in all capacities.
Series 26 Principal who
directed subordinates to take the test for others:
- Rebecca Sappington received a $10,000 fine, a
bar as a principal and a six-month suspension in all
capacities
Series 6 Representatives who directed
or allowed a subordinate to take their proficiency tests:
- Jeffery Coleman received a $5,000 fine and a 60-day
suspension.
- Walter Culbreth received a $5,000 fine and a 60-day
suspension.
- Beverly Lochard received a $5,000 fine and a 60-day
suspension.
- William Nickum received a $5,000 fine and a 60-day suspension.
- Robert Olive received a $5,000 fine and a 60-day suspension.
- Valerie Tichy-Drummer received a $5,000 fine and a 60-day
suspension.
- Karen Curtis received a $5,000 fine and a 60 day suspension.
Series 6 Representatives who completed
the proficiency tests for their superiors:
- Kenneth Capell received a $5,000 fine and a 30-day suspension.
- Mayka Hardy received a $5,000 fine and a 30-day suspension.
- Teresa King received a $5,000 fine and a 30-day suspension.
- Lori Love received a $5,000 fine and a 30-day suspension.
- Heather Montagne received a $5,000 fine and a 30-day
suspension.
- John Reich received a $5,000 fine and a 30-day suspension.
|
Fredricka Dale Watson
20060052704/February 2008
Watson took notes
into a Regulatory Element of Continuing Education exam and looked at them
before they were confiscated by an examiner, even though she had
acknowledged that it was prohibited prior to the exam. Watson failed to
respond to FINRA requests for information.
Fredricka Dale Watson: Barred
|
Rebecca Rhoden Sappington (Principal)
AWC/2005003511202/January 2008
Sappington directed individuals
under her supervision to complete the computer-based Firm Element
Continuing Education program on registered representatives' behalf
without any notice to, or authorization from, her member firm .
Rebecca Rhoden Sappington (Principal): Fined $10,000; Suspended 6
months; Barred in Principal capacity
|
|
Bill Singer's
Comment: And the reason that Sappington gets 6 months and Curtis
got 60 days is what? I'm not suggesting there isn't a valid reason,
just pointing out that FINRA doesn't bother to offer one.
|
Kenneth Mark Doolittle (Principal)
OS/#E0120040052-03/January 2008
Doolittle caused his member firm to respond untimely to FINRA requests
for information and willfully omitted material information from his Form
U4 by failing to timely amend it. Doolittle permitted a registered
representative of his member firm to engage in conduct for which
registration was required while inactive
due to failure to complete regulatory element continuing education.
Kenneth Mark Doolittle (Principal): Suspended 3 months
|
Karen Denise Curtis
AWC/#2005003511201/January 2008
Curtis delegated a subordinate
in her office to complete the computer-based Firm Element Continuing
Education program on registered representatives' behalf.
Karen Denise Curtis: Fined $5,000; Suspended 60 days.
|
|
Bill Singer's
Comment: I have so many mixed emotions about this case. A straight
reading of the facts seems to suggest that the subordinate was taking the
exams for other RRs (plural). A professional athlete--say a baseball
player-- could
cheat by taking steroids and makes lots of bucks and then a former Senator
would investigate and advise against any criminal prosecution. On,
how this case reminds me of the "Newspeak" of
Orwell's 1984. Isn't it charming how the act of CHEATING on a
mandatory test is euphemistically transformed through the magic of
regulatory language into the delegation to a subordinate of
the completion of the test. I can just imagine
some over muscled pro athlete claiming that he didn't take steroids but
simply delegated the task of fitness conditioning to a trainer with a
syringe. Omigod! Am I really lecturing a regulator to do the
right thing and get tougher? Maybe I can delegate this task to
someone else?
|
THIS WEBSITE MAY BE DEEMED AN ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT OR SOLICITATION IN SOME JURISDICTIONS. AS SUCH, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE HIRING OF AN ATTORNEY IS AN IMPORTANT DECISION THAT SHOULD NOT BE BASED SOLELY UPON ADVERTISEMENTS. MOREOVER, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. NEITHER THE TRANSMISSION NOR YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE WILL CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SENDER AND RECEIVER. WEBSITE SUBSCRIBERS AND ONLINE READERS SHOULD NOT TAKE, OR REFRAIN FROM TAKING, ANY ACTION BASED UPON CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE. THE CONTENT PUBLISHED ON THIS WEBSITE REPRESENTS THE PERSONAL VIEWS OF THE AUTHOR AND NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OF ANY LAW FIRM OR ORGANIZATION WITH WHICH HE MAY BE AFFILIATED. ALL CONTENT IS PROVIDED AS GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS LEGAL ADVICE. CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE MAY BE INCORRECT FOR YOUR JURISDICTION AND THE UNDERLYING RULES, REGULATIONS AND/OR DECISIONS MAY NO LONGER BE CONTROLLING OR PERSUASIVE AS A MATTER OF LAW OR INTERPRETATION.
|
 |
|