NOTE: Offers of Settlement (OS) and Letters of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent (AWC) are entered into by Respondents without admitting or denying the allegations, but consent is given to the described sanctions and to the entry of findings. 2006
|
Libertas Partners, LLC AWC/#E112005021201/December 2006 The Firm permitted individuals to perform duties that require registration while their NASD registrations were inactive due to their failure to complete the Regulatory Element of the Continuing Education Program. Libertas Partners, LLC: Censured; Fined $10,000 |
Richard Lewis Rosen (Principal) #E102002179201/November 2006 Acting through Rosen, his member firm
Rosen failed to complete the regulatory element of NASD’s Continuing Education requirement, which caused his registration to be inactive while he continued to effect securities transactions and serve as a president of the firm. The findings also included that the firm, acting through Rosen, (NASD Case ) Richard Lewis Rosen: Barred |
Michael Ta-Zen Huang #2005000476101)/July 2006 Huang misrepresented his identity by using another registered representative’s computer password to complete a firm-required continuing education session for the other registered representative. Huang failed to respond to NASD requests for information. Michael Ta-Zen Huang: Barred |
Research Capital USA Inc. AWC/#E112005001102/June 2006 The Firm failed
Research Capital USA Inc. : Censured; Fined $20,000 ($5,000 of which joint/several with unnamed individual) |
Bullaro Securities Corp.and Sal Stephen Bullaro (Principal) AWC/#ELI20040026-01/June 2006 Firm permitted Bullaro—the firm’s president and sole executive officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Financial and Operations Principal—to conduct securities business while his securities registration was inactive due to his failure to timely satisfy the Continuing Education/Regulatory Element requirement. Acting through Bullaro, the Firm failed to include in its trial balances any of the firm’s proprietary positions and related haircut charges associated with its substantial American Stock Exchange floor business that resulted in its net capital computations being inaccurate. Bullaro Securities Corp.: Censured; Fined $10,000 (joint/several with Bullaro) Sal Stephen Bullaro (Principal): Fined $10,000 (jt/sev with Bullaro Securities); Suspended 30 days in FINOP capacity |
Desjardins Securities International, Inc. AWC/#E112004005401/May 2006 The Firm did not maintain and preserve all email and instant messaging communications, as required by SEC rule 17a-4. The Firm failed to complete an annual training needs analysis and to develop and implement its written training plan to achieve compliance with the Firm Element of the Continuing Education Rule. Desjardins Securities International, Inc.: Censured; Fined $130,000; Required to revise its procedures with respect to applicable securities laws and regulations, and NASD rules concerning the preservation of electronic communications. |
Sky Capital LLC (CRD #114657, New York, New York) AWC/E1020030479-02/February 2006 Sky Capital LLC acted as a placement agent in private placement offerings involving minimum-maximum contingencies, and was not included as a party in any written agreement with a bank under which the bank agreed to hold all money or other consideration received in escrow for the persons who had the beneficial interests therein, and to transmit or return such funds directly to the persons entitled thereto when the appropriate event or contingency had occurred. The firm permitted an individual to act in a capacity that required registration while his NASD registration status was inactive due to his failure to complete the Regulatory Element of NASD’s Continuing Education Requirement. Sky Capital LLC: Censured; Fined $15,000 |
Thieme Securities, Inc. and Heiko Helmut Thieme (Principal) AWC/E102004040401/January 2006 Acting through Thieme, the Firm
Thieme Securities and Heiko Helmut Thieme: Censured; Fined $15,000 (joint/several) |
Bill Singer's Comment: Frankly, the sanctions here seem a bit light when compared to other recent matters involving similar lapses --- possibly the Respondents had excellent legal representation or the NASD considered some mitigating factors. In any event we're talking about a firm without a FINOP for over 2 years and without a CE plan for 4 years. And let's not even forget the basic requirement to maintain your bank recons. |