|
TO ERR IS HUMAN, BUT SHOULD YOU PUT IT IN THE ERROR ACCOUNT? by Bill Singer, Esq. Transactions that are transferred from a customer account to a firm "error account" because the transaction may have violated industry rules would not be considered bona fide corrections, cancellations, or errors. In the jargon of our industry, when we enter a trade pursuant to a mistake it's called an "error." Firms typically transfer such goofs to an Error Account. Accordingly, the losses and costs of such mistakes are often assessed in full or in part against the registered representative. Because such policy is frequently the source of contention, many firms utilize a formula that permits a percentage of non-chargeable bad trades versus a twelve-month trail. IS IT AN ERROR OR A VIOLATION? A trade error typically results from a miscommunication between a registered representative and customer, or results from a processing failure between the taking of the order and its entry. Sometimes the scenario is simple: I thought you said to buy 100 XYZ, not 100 XYC.Other times the cause of the error may be inherent in the order's processing; for example, you review your trade confirmations and note that the trader mistakenly executed an order for account 1324 instead of 1234. In contradistinction to the above example, imagine a situation where an RR intentionally enters an unauthorized order for 10,000 shares of XYZ for Mr. Smith's account. Subsequent to the order, the Director of Compliance learns that Mr. Smith has been deceased for two weeks prior to the execution. The trade is cancelled by the firm and placed in the Error Account. In this example there was no error arising out of an understandably mistaken belief or a typical processing snafu. To the contrary, this trade was busted because it was determined to be in violation of industry rules and regulations. Attempts to correct legitimate errors through trade corrections or cancellations may properly belong in an Error Account; however, transactions transferred to an Error Account because of determinations that they violated industry rules would not be considered bona fideerrors. The NASD is scrutinizing the use of Error Accounts for trades that were executed in apparent violation of either the SOES rules, the affirmative determination provisions of NASD Rule 3370, or the short sale rule (NASD Rule 3350). WILL THIS ERROR TRADE BE DEEMED A PROPRIETARY TRADE? Assuming that a BD improperly places trades into the Error Account, the consequences could be disastrous. Assuming that the trade at issue is one-sided (a buy or a sell), the firm's capital would be subjected to market risk until such time as the Error Account position is offset and closed. Similarly, if a round trip is placed into the Error Account, the firm's capital would absorb the resulting loss (or profit). Such use of the Error Account subjects the firm's capital to market risk and concerns the NASD. More pointedly, NASD member firms operating pursuant to minimum net capital requirements of less than $100,000, including members that are typically subject to a $5,000 requirement, may be engaging in activity that could cause them to be considered dealers under the Net Capital Rule and therefore be subject to a $100,000 minimum net capital requirement.
WORD TO THE WISE: YOU'RE NOT THE FIRST TO THINK OF THISAt times BDs misuse their Error Accounts as synthetic Trading Accounts. The dangerous
game here seeks to avoid the higher net capital requirement by intentionally executing
"flawed" orders so that they may be placed into the Error Account, with the firm
keeping the resulting proprietary trading profit without the onus of a $100,000 Net
Captial requirement. Unfortunately, I've defended many such cases and I've heard it
all (as has the NASD): we mixed up the clients' names, we transposed the account
numbers, we wrote a lot of tickets that day and must have mistakenly put an extra trade
through. The consequences of such a violation may be the need to deposit
additional net capital, and significant fines and suspensions. Worse, absent an ability to
increase Net Capital to $100,000 the BD may need to close! |
RRBDLAW.COM AND SECURITIES INDUSTRY COMMENTATOR™ © 2004 BILL SINGER THIS WEBSITE MAY BE DEEMED AN ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT OR SOLICITATION IN SOME JURISDICTIONS. AS SUCH, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE HIRING OF AN ATTORNEY IS AN IMPORTANT DECISION THAT SHOULD NOT BE BASED SOLELY UPON ADVERTISEMENTS. MOREOVER, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. NEITHER THE TRANSMISSION NOR YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE WILL CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SENDER AND RECEIVER. WEBSITE SUBSCRIBERS AND ONLINE READERS SHOULD NOT TAKE, OR REFRAIN FROM TAKING, ANY ACTION BASED UPON CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE. THE CONTENT PUBLISHED ON THIS WEBSITE REPRESENTS THE PERSONAL VIEWS OF THE AUTHOR AND NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OF ANY LAW FIRM OR ORGANIZATION WITH WHICH HE MAY BE AFFILIATED. ALL CONTENT IS PROVIDED AS GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS LEGAL ADVICE. CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE MAY BE INCORRECT FOR YOUR JURISDICTION AND THE UNDERLYING RULES, REGULATIONS AND/OR DECISIONS MAY NO LONGER BE CONTROLLING OR PERSUASIVE AS A MATTER OF LAW OR INTERPRETATION.
Telephone: 917-520-2836 Fax at 720-559-2800 E-mail to bsinger@rrbdlaw.com FOR DETAILS ABOUT MR. SINGER, PLEASE READ HIS ONLINE BIOGRAPHY |